Jan 19
/
Naz
Zuckerberg and his AGI plan
1. From my perspective, men are likely to be the most affected by new technologies unless they adapt quickly and effectively. This is reminiscent of a recent article in FAZ, where a German Nobel Prize-winning professor cautioned against developing AI as it might lead to increased unemployment.
I needed to ask:
1. Can I trust these sources?
2. Is the idea clear or just full of complicated terms?
3. Does it help make AI ethical and for everyone?
4. Does it make me feel something strong?
Zuckerberg's AGI strategy seems more confusing than groundbreaking.
Here's why:
1. Understanding AGI: Does Zuckerberg really get it? Seems doubtful.
2. Chasing AGI: It looks like he's just trying to keep up with others, not leading the way.
3. Open Source or Closed: His plans keep changing – one day it's open for all, the next, it's not.
4. Confidence: Why does he think he can lead in AGI? Maybe because he got some fancy tech first (some Nvidia chips).
5. What about the Metaverse promise? It's still there, but now AGI is the new favorite.
It's worrying to see our digital future in the hands of a few (white, young, socially handicapped, male) tech leaders.
This isn't the visionary approach of Gates and Jobs. Instead, it's about making money from our social identities which we live online.
This situation is more than a tech competition; it's about shaping our digital world. We need to speak up, demand clear answers, and push for an AI future that's fair, open, and truly benefits everyone.
WOMEN AI ACADEMY
Women AI Academy is a gender-equality and technology driven learning & development organization
Site Terms & Info
ETHOS AI Training & Consulting GmbH
Weihenstephanerstr.1281673
Munich-Germany
We are driven by the vision of making AI both ethical and accessible to everyone
Copyright © 2024 Brought to you by Ethos ai AI Training & Consultancy GmbH
Ali Hessami is currently the Director of R&D and Innovation at Vega Systems, London, UK. He has an extensive track record in systems assurance and safety, security, sustainability, knowledge assessment/management methodologies. He has a background in the design and development of advanced control systems for business and safety-critical industrial applications.
Hessami represents the UK on the European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization (CENELEC) & International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) – safety systems, hardware & software standards committees. He was appointed by CENELEC as convener of several Working Groups for review of EN50128 Safety-Critical Software Standard and update and restructuring of the software, hardware, and system safety standards in CENELEC.
Ali is also a member of Cyber Security Standardisation SGA16, SG24, and WG26 Groups and started and chairs the IEEE Special Interest Group in Humanitarian Technologies and the Systems Council Chapters in the UK and Ireland Section. In 2017 Ali joined the IEEE Standards Association (SA), initially as a committee member for the new landmark IEEE 7000 standard focused on “Addressing Ethical Concerns in System Design.” He was subsequently appointed as the Technical Editor and later the Chair of P7000 working group. In November 2018, he was appointed as the VC and Process Architect of the IEEE’s global Ethics Certification Programme for Autonomous & Intelligent Systems (ECPAIS).
Trish advises and trains organisations internationally on Responsible AI (AI/data ethics, policy, governance), and Corporate Digital Responsibility.
Patricia has 20 years’ experience as a lawyer in data, technology and regulatory/government affairs and is a registered Solicitor in England and Wales, and the Republic of Ireland. She has authored and edited several works on law and regulation, policy, ethics, and AI.
She is an expert advisor on the Ethics Committee to the UK’s Digital Catapult Machine Intelligence Garage working with AI startups, is a Maestro (a title only given to 3 people in the world) and expert advisor “Maestro” on the IEEE’s CertifAIEd (previously known as ECPAIS) ethical certification panel, sits on IEEE’s P7003 (algorithmic bias)/P2247.4 (adaptive instructional systems)/P7010.1 (AI and ESG/UN SDGS) standards programmes, is a ForHumanity Fellow working on Independent Audit of AI Systems, is Chair of the Society for Computers and Law, and is a non-exec director on the Board of iTechlaw and on the Board of Women Leading in AI. Until 2021, Patricia was on the RSA’s online harms advisory panel, whose work contributed to the UK’s Online Safety Bill.
Trish is also a linguist and speaks fluently English, French, and German.
In 2021, Patricia was listed on the 100 Brilliant Women in AI Ethics™ and named on Computer Weekly’s longlist as one of the Most Influential Women in UK Technology in 2021.
Created with
